Build on Assignment #1 Disadvantaged Children and Health Insurance: The Health Problem

Build on Assignment #1 Disadvantaged Children and Health Insurance: The Health Problem – Health Policy Link

Complete the assignment using the table format provided below. Except for titles, narrative format is expected with complete sentences. The table should be single spaced and a maximum of three (3) pages. Also include a cover page and a reference page in APA Format (these do not count toward the page limit). Reference the bolded formatting requirements in the Class Guidelines section of the Syllabus.

HGMT 310 Assignment #2
Student Name:
Type your name here.
Assignment #2 Title:
Provide a short name of your assignment submission and official title of the legislation.
Implementation:
Identify the federal or state agency and subunit (such as a department, bureau or office) responsible for implementing the policy. If multiple agencies are involved, indicate the roles and responsibilities of each.

Describe how the legislation is implemented? Are local public health departments involved? Are collaborating organizations engaged to achieve the aims of the policy? Are citizen’s involved? Are health provider organizations involved? Are grants awarded?
Enforcement:
What federal or state agency is responsible for enforcement? If multiple agencies are involved, indicate the roles and responsibilities of each.

What are the key areas for enforcement? How will compliance be measured, if at all? What penalties will be assessed, if any?
Impact on Health Care Organizations:
What should a Health Care Administrator know about this legislation and its related implementation? Include five bullets of how this legislation impacts health care organizations operating in your home state.
Resource(s):
What resource(s) would a health care organization utilize to find updates regarding the impact this policy has on them?

The grading rubric for this assignment appears below if you opened the Assignment in the Assignment Folder. It can also be opened by clicking on the ‘Written Assignment Rubric’ tab in the lower right corner of the screen, if you opened the Assignment in Content.

Due Date
Apr 8, 2017 11:59 PM

Hide Rubrics
Rubric Name: Written Assignment Rubric

Criteria Outstanding Superior Good Below Standard Failure
Critical Thinking/Reasoning 35 points

demonstrates a high degree of critical thinking, is consistent in accurately interpreting questions & material; provides solid assumptions, reasoning & claims; provides thorough analysis & evaluation with sound conclusions
31.5 points

shows good critical thinking; accurately interprets most questions & material; usually identifies relevant arguments/reasoning/claims; offers good analysis & evaluation with fairly sound conclusions
24.5 points

shows occasional critical thinking; questions & material is at times accurately interpreted; arguments/reasoning/claims are occasionally explained; offers fair analysis & evaluation with a conclusion
21 points

shows little critical thinking, misinterprets questions or material; ignores or superficially evaluates; justifies little and seldom explains reasoning; draws unwarranted conclusions
0 points

lacks critical thinking consistently offers biased interpretations; ignores or superficially evaluates; argues using poor reasoning, and/or unwarranted claims
Application of Concepts/Development 35 points

arguments or positions are well-supported with evidence from the readings/experience; ideas go beyond the course material and recognize implications and extensions of the material and concepts
31.5 points

arguments or positions are mostly supported by evidence from the readings and course content; ideas presented demonstrate student’s understanding of the material and concepts
24.5 points

arguments are more often based on opinion or unclear views than on position grounded in the readings of material or external sources of material
21 points

arguments are frequently illogical and unsubstantiated; student may resort to ad hominem attacks on the author instead of making meaningful application of the material
5 points

There is no meaningful attempt to explain or support ideas
Attention to Instructions 15 points

demonstrated full understanding of requirements; responded to each aspect of assignment
13.5 points

demonstrated understanding of requirements; missed one minor aspect of assignment
10.5 points

demonstrated some understanding of requirements; missed a key element or two minor aspects of assignment
9 points

failed to show a firm understanding of requirements; missed two key elements or several minor aspects of assignment
0 points

did not demonstrate understanding of assignment requirements
Clarity; grammar & APA 15 points

writing is clear and easy to follow; grammar and spelling are all correct; formatting gives a professional look and adds to readability, no APA style errors
13.5 points

most ideas are presented clearly; occasional spelling and/or grammar issues, attempts in-text citation and reference list but 1 or 2 APA style errors are present
10.5 points

wordy; some points require rereading to understand fully; more than an occasional spelling and/or grammar, attempts in-text citation and reference list; APA style errors are present; inconsistencies in citation usage can be found throughout the document
9 points

unclear and difficult to understand; frequent spelling and grammar issues, attempts either in-text citation or reference list but omits the other
0 points

Very difficult to understand, poorly written in terms of mechanics and structure
Overall Score Outstanding

100 or more